From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 19:37:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5627416A468; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3513C457; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873982083; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:37:21 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.3/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06609207F; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:37:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DCFF0844F4; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:37:20 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Mike Pritchard References: <200801261303.m0QD3af2093786@repoman.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:37:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200801261303.m0QD3af2093786@repoman.freebsd.org> (Mike Pritchard's message of "Sat\, 26 Jan 2008 13\:03\:36 +0000 \(UTC\)") Message-ID: <86ir0xc45r.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man5 fstab.5 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:37:29 -0000 Mike Pritchard writes: > Log: > Explain how the passno field in /etc/fstab works with fsck > and quotacheck in some more detail. One thing that isn't entirely clear: how do fsck and quotacheck behave for passno > 1? I get the impression (both from the man page and from previous mailing list discussions) that all file systems with a passno above 1 are treated equally, rather than being ranked by their passno. This is highly undesirable on systems that use labels instead of disk / slice / partition names, since fsck and quotacheck will think all the file systems are on different drives, when in fact they may all be on the same drive. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no