Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 17:03:27 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: dg@Root.COM Cc: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel assertions Message-ID: <673.838652607@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jul 1996 06:58:31 PDT." <199607291358.GAA26833@root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199607291358.GAA26833@root.com>, David Greenman writes: >>This was a simple example but I'm sure it could make code a lot less >>intricate in other places. > > ...and a lot less informative. I prefer the existing model. I think that they supplement each other, they are certainly not exclusive. I still think it's a good idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?673.838652607>