From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 18 18:25:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AD216A4EC
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA9943D79
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 10C32413D; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:25:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:25:38 -0500
To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060818182538.GB7482@soaustin.net>
References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru>
	<20060817082940.GB845@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
	<20060818122138.GF78016@underworld.novel.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060818122138.GF78016@underworld.novel.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:25:45 -0000

On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:21:38PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > There are severe logistical problems: Ports are currently expected to
> > build for at least 3 different src branches, with between 2 and 6
> > different architectures in each.  Multiply this by over 15,000 ports
> > and that process isn't going to work.  And this ignores interactions
> 
> Yeah, that's the problem we should find a solution for.

Other than adding a lot more build machines and/or decreasing the number
of ports, what do you have in mind?

mcl