From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 09:17:38 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECEB37B401
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE1343F93
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5UGHbAI020457;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030630154618.93274.qmail@web80511.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306301216050.20122-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About the kse signal process
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:17:38 -0000

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> --- Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   I am wondering that the following piece of code
> > > can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it
> > with
> > > 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I
> > > send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it
> > should
> > > be received by the thr_func() only, and print a
> > prompt
> > > msg on the console.
> > 
> > Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm.
> This is the issue. Nothing printed on the console when
> I sent the signal SIGALRM, it meant that none of the
> thread received this signal.

It works for me with both libc_r and libkse.  This is from
a very recent -current.  I can't test under 5.1-release.
There have been some changes lately with regard to signals
in -current and libkse.  I don't know about libc_r...

--
Dan Eischen