From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 25 23:04:20 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4027D106564A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55AB14E45D;
	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EA74073.7070206@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:04:19 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>
References: <20111020114844.GK59810@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<20111020122121.GL59810@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<201110211636.05917.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20111025140000.GA8559@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<CAG=rPVdS+POJqATw7kmb0+b9byp3r2Vp8o=ELRFj9K7rA1zpYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EA71713.3020404@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAG=rPVcABO=L7Wnzb_8nDb7367CQ6j8PyF-sHC4ra4TfJQ4paQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EA721F2.3010804@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAG=rPVcNsK0Q8GbJPZbFv7W9QoWP2+=Bgp1EFnZg6sJyQXNbzw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVcNsK0Q8GbJPZbFv7W9QoWP2+=Bgp1EFnZg6sJyQXNbzw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:04:20 -0000

On 10/25/2011 14:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Doug Barton
>> Actually hex would still work since 0x.... would match. :)
> 
> Yes, but if in the future, a revision number format is ever chosen
> that doesn't include
> 0x at the beginning, and is something like:
> a23728ea7d592acc69b36875a482cdf3fd5c8d
> 
> then this check would fail.  However, none of this
> exists yet in SVN, so it is not worth worry about
> right now.

Yes, that was what the smiley at the end of my sentence above was
intending to convey. Sorry I wasn't more clear. :)


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/