From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 27 02:40:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D15B16A4BF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 02:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F71743FE9
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 02:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7R9eEA3009328;
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Martin Jessa <freebsd@yazzy.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:35:49 +0200."
             <20030827113549.5081576e.freebsd@yazzy.org> 
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:40:14 +0200
Message-ID: <9327.1061977214@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: if_sis: performance tweaking 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:40:18 -0000

In message <20030827113549.5081576e.freebsd@yazzy.org>, Martin Jessa writes:
>Hi Poul-Henning, guys.
>
>Are those changes included in 5.1-CURRENT now or should I patch my source in order to test it? 
>

The short cable patch is included, the others are not because we are
still trying to determine what values are optimal.

Any input you have in that respect are most welcome (send it to sam@ and phk@)


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.