From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jul 21 11:22:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA00750
          for stable-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 11:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00745
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 11:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id EAA23031; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 04:12:53 +1000
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 04:12:53 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199707211812.EAA23031@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: conrads@neosoft.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: mount_msdos -- is it safe yet?
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Has the support for DOS mounts in RELENG_2_2 progressed yet to the point
>where it would be safe to mount my 1.6 gig DOS/Win95 drive (one huge
>partition) without fear of corrupting my ufs?

Support for DOS mounts hasn't progressed much for 2-3 years (diffs
for sys/msdosfs are a whole 35K, half for Lite2 integration, since
1996/01/01), but the ufs corruption bug was fixed slightly before 2.2
was released (it was was mostly in vfs).

Bruce