Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Sep 1997 10:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
To:        "Riley J. McIntire" <rileyj@tgci.com>
Cc:        isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Moving server to different ethernet can I use the same IP #s?
Message-ID:  <Pine.UW2.3.95.970903095654.9174B-100000@cedb>
In-Reply-To: <199709030415.VAA24888@train.tgci.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Riley J. McIntire wrote:
>  What I've tried so far is bind an ip # from the new net to the 
> interface.  I can telnet to this ip number from the new network.
> The default gateway is now 205.185.169.1 (a cisco 2500)
> Do I need to add a route from the cisco to the old numbers?  How? 
> Speaking of which, the numbers are 206.250.85.99 to x.x.x.109.

On the cisco

ip route 206.250.85.96 255.255.255.240 205.185.169.120

That is for a /28 subnet with usable addresses from 97-110,
probably what you have.

> ifconfig_ed1="inet 205.185.169.120 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> 
> router_enable="YES"             # Set to YES to enable a routing daemon.

This will probably cause you fits.  Turn off routed.

> /sbin/ifconfig ed1 alias 206.250.85.99 netmask 255.255.255.0 up

This one is fine.

> /sbin/ifconfig ed1 alias 206.250.85.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 up

This one, and the others that follow, need a netmask of 255.255.255.255

> /sbin/route add -net 205.185.169.0 -interface 205.185.169.120 -netmask

Get rid of this.

Dan
-- 
 Dan Busarow                                                  714 443 4172
 DPC Systems / Beach.Net                                    dan@dpcsys.com
 Dana Point, California  83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4   8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.UW2.3.95.970903095654.9174B-100000>