From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jun 29 19:18:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA04163
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 29 Jun 1996 19:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA04129;
          Sat, 29 Jun 1996 19:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id MAA18022
          ; Sat, 29 Jun 1996 12:00:11 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id EAA15398; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:44:05 +1000
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:44:05 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199606291844.EAA15398@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, wosch@softs11.ZIB-Berlin.DE
Subject: Re: make clean in src/lkm problems
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG,
        wosch@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Jordan changed the order of the include files in bsd.kmod.mk.
>JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!  Why did you do that? The
>order is still important. And the order will be important if we move

Order shouldn't be important, and there were no comments :-).

>My intention was a single 'clean:' target in bsd.obj.mk. Except
>if the top makefile (./obj/Makefile, ./Makefile) does 
>have their own clean target.

By adding things to CLEANFILES, etc?  bsd.lib.mk currently has a much
larger clean rule, but it doen't need to unless there is a problem
with the command line lengths.

>PS: now I have ~200 'obj' trouble mails in my mailbox. Was it that
>worth?

Automatically generated mails?

Bruce