From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 23 07:58:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012509A0 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 07:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (smtp-sofia.digsys.bg [193.68.21.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp-sofia.digsys.bg", Issuer "Digital Systems Operational CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A3E2E26 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 07:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dcave.digsys.bg (dcave.digsys.bg [193.68.6.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id s4N7n83f012891 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 10:49:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) Message-ID: <537EFD74.4060007@digsys.bg> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:49:08 +0300 From: Daniel Kalchev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is your favourite/best firewall on FreeBSD and why? References: <20140520070926.GA92183@The.ie> In-Reply-To: <20140520070926.GA92183@The.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:58:50 -0000 On 20.05.14 10:09, Lucius Rizzo wrote: > Ultimately, outside configuration differences all firewalls are essentially > serve the same purpose but I wonder what is your favorite and why? If > you were to run FreeBSD in production, which of the three would you > choose? IPFilter, PF or IPFW? Coming from BSD/OS, IPFW was my natural choice. Have been using it for many, many years. But, as it turns our, for many years, it has an problem with table manipulation, that wasn't fixed, so for these applications I switched to PF. I still prefer the IPFW style configuration and management though. Daniel