From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 23 16:10:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B5914FE1 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 16:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115220>; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:11:12 +1100 Content-return: prohibited From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: With feature freeze being in place In-reply-to: <20000122210136.B18600@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from asmodai@wxs.nl on Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 07:03:10AM +1100 To: Nick Hibma Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai , FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing List Message-Id: <00Jan24.111112est.115220@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <20000122210136.B18600@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:11:12 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2000-Jan-23 07:03:10 +1100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: >Also, are GENERIC and LINT in sync? Comparing LINT and GENERIC is made more difficult by the significantly different ordering. Is there some good reason for this, or would an offer of GENERIC re-written into the same order as LINT be accepted? Also, what is the best approach to submitting documentation for the `undocumented' options in LINT? send-pr for each option seems excessive (and the resultant diffs would be a pain to generate or apply except in the original order). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message