From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Sep 30 08:20:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA18011 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:20:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA18001 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA24834; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:19:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons To: "Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=" cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IBM's cool disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I really have to agree here. I couldn't believe the difference between IBM DDRS-34560W and the ultra-wide 'cudas and atlas-I,II's that I have. I would be skeptical of the awesome viking-II's until they've been around a while and their firmware is proven reliable. My personal history with Quantum has been firmware hell. -c On 30 Sep 1998, Dag-Erling C. [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > One more argument in favor of IBM disks is that they reputedly run > cooler and quieter than Quantum or Seagate disks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message