From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 29 6:41:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from commov.commercialmovers.com (commov.commercialmovers.com [204.107.254.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3591563D for ; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 06:41:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmutter@commercialmovers.com) Received: from commercialmovers.com ([192.196.1.177]) by commov.commercialmovers.com (8.8.8/SCO5) with ESMTP id JAA18657 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:43:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <386A1F3A.34A46F19@commercialmovers.com> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:48:26 -0500 From: "James A. Mutter" Organization: Commercial Movers, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Natd or IPFW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm in a situation where I might need to implement some form of address translation on our local network. I'll do it with FreeBSD, my question is do I do it with natd or do I do it with IPFW? I realize that both are capable - is one 'better' than the other? Thanks, Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message