From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 09:09:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C61106566C; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7751B8FC0A; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so299793fxm.13 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 02:09:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VU541IZSoibxOPNpZsgVy5Vowu2zJofbgO1n4M1rr9c=; b=suwJNwVl6hbGgfVSo4g7RHhDdB7j1dsia63uhugQKUSkcmdeEEsJlUX8cEeYt3dkMv FFZtNfqdXAmDTcyTNP/fXpMUHp70GnCApAO3j54bVJBMsJbXZXWPnXzuDqdl/KYgDjkz 1whV6ev9Dg6KDM3NyCcMSZTQG0OdD7gmVnAy8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EF4TaEhq1KbQZ2PWuJ9q5hJvXlovDu2NLj1nT7FlXnhXT+nzt99cJ4+k8d4+lZtB31 Zjy0/EcJ/06TS7PM+jiNCgv2e7fVW0iM/cQhcupz8fp4oE6FBujrHS0dIrLRAvwekhEs 6eIWy8r0uj6ffxekiz56iqlb14ukM+tNZzXOU= Received: by 10.204.82.227 with SMTP id c35mr4389528bkl.174.1274949698907; Thu, 27 May 2010 01:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.jennejohn.org (p578E3BD9.dip.t-dialin.net [87.142.59.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1sm4450339bkl.14.2010.05.27.01.41.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 May 2010 01:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:41:36 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Alexey Shuvaev Message-ID: <20100527104136.6b7d5e7b@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100526223502.GA5319@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> References: <20100511132709.GA47986@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <4BE9639C.8060102@FreeBSD.org> <20100511182119.GA46020@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <20100526223502.GA5319@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Tom Russo , Robert Noland Subject: Re: Xorg 7.5 and Openmotif applications. X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:09:56 -0000 On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:35:02 +0200 Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > > > > > > > > Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > > > >Hello list! > > > > > > > >There seems to be a known/fixed bug in new xserver that leads to > > > >(many|all?) motif-based applications to malfunction: > > > >https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25400 > > > > > > > >There are already at least 2 PRs opened against individual ports: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146383 > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146380 > > > > > > > >I think it is wrong to patch applications when the fault seems to be > > > >in the server. Now I am running patched xserver with the patch pulled > > > >from the upstream git master: > > > >http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=1c612acca8568fcdf9761d23f112adaf4d496f1b > > > > > > > >I confirm that math/grace now works OK (PR 141383). > > > >I'll watch if the patch causes any side effects (nothing so far). > > > >What about dropping attached patch to x11-servers/xorg-server/files? > > > > > > > >Cross-posting to ports@ as the bug already leaked in the individual > > > >ports' PRs. > > > > > > Let's look at updating to 1.7.7 or 1.8.0. I need to poke the commit > > > logs for 1.7.7 and see if it is included. > > > > > Even better so. Just downloaded xorg-server-1.7.7.tar.gz and the patch > > is already there: > > > > [snip] > > > > |--- dix/events.c.orig > > |+++ dix/events.c > > -------------------------- > > Patching file dix/events.c using Plan A... > > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n > > > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far. > Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7? > Should I file PR? > I think you can remove PORTEPOCH in the patch. The patch works for me. I'd say that you should file a PR. -- Gary Jennejohn