Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:23:51 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@bfoz.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ucom and sio Message-ID: <20050110232351.GG19624@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <41E08199.3000405@bfoz.net> References: <40170.4.248.235.201.1104333403.squirrel@4.248.235.201> <20050102.220156.79545944.imp@bsdimp.com> <41E036AF.2030407@bfoz.net> <200501091115.00779.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <41E08199.3000405@bfoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brandon Fosdick wrote this message on Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 16:58 -0800: > Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >Is it blocking waiting for carrier detect to come up? > >Try using the cuaNN device instead. > > The software in question worked fine using a cuaNN device until said > device died. > > Somebody else mentioned that I could set the device to ignore the > carrier detect signal. How do I do that? Is it a flag to tcsetattr() or > some kind of ioctl? You can also do that on the lock and/or inital device... stty -f /dev/ttyd0.lock clocal -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050110232351.GG19624>