Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:29:35 +0400 (MSD)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970605032630.3370C-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
In-Reply-To: <9456.865466424@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> > At any rate, I suggest you back out the change and ask Jordan for
> > review.  This is clearly his region as it concerns the release and not 
> > only "make world".
> 
> I'd like to argue for the introduction of SHARED=copies as the
> hard-wired behavior.  If we're ever to create a more compartmentalized
> system, as everyone is ranting for, then we need to decouple things
> like "bin" and "src".

I see most unpleasant case with current method is potential /sys &
/usr/include files mispatch (in case someone bump kernel file limit f.e.) 
and possible missing availability of some kernel deeper level directories
from user program, I suggest to keep symlinks as they are in source case
and extract only *.h files from kernel source to /sys to prevent bloating.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970605032630.3370C-100000>