Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:24:35 -0500
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.ca>
To:        ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD as VPN server for Win2000 Clients
Message-ID:  <3.0.5.32.20000328142435.01f69b20@marble.sentex.ca>
In-Reply-To: <200003281638.BAA90960@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
References:  <20000328151254.89244.qmail@hotmail.com> <20000328151254.89244.qmail@hotmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:38 AM 3/29/00 +0900, ARIGA Seiji wrote:
># As far as IPsec concerned, KAME snap is more stable than KAME merged
># in FreeBSD4, in my opinion. So you'd better use FreeBSD3 with KAME
># snap for your purpose.
>
>--
>ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp>


Are there any plans to merge KAME snap into RELENG_4 any time soon ?

	---Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa,                          	          tel +1 519 651 3400
Network Administrator,     			  mike@sentex.net
Sentex Communications                 		  www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20000328142435.01f69b20>