From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 18 19:16:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27CC16A49E
	for <freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:16:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca)
Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0ACA43DA6
	for <freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:16:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca)
Received: from clk01a ([24.202.77.103]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005))
	with ESMTP id <0J5S00082YUUZ890@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for
	freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:16:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:15:56 -0400
From: Nicolas Blais <nb_root@videotron.ca>
In-reply-to: <i473u3-2c1.ln1@news.t-online.com>
To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org, rotkap@gmx.de
Message-id: <200609181516.05432.nb_root@videotron.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2733244.NFQiRs39Q9;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <p2b0u3-ui41.ln1@news.t-online.com>
	<200609171720.59091.nb_root@videotron.ca>
	<i473u3-2c1.ln1@news.t-online.com>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Why there is a newer OOo port than the binary?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:16:34 -0000

--nextPart2733244.NFQiRs39Q9
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

> Okay, I Understand.
>
> But, it is not good, to put rel-candidates into the stable tree.
> Maybe another port subtree is the solution? At least your explanation
> sounds like..
>
> Maybe
>
> editors/openoffice.org-2.0-rc OR
> editors/openoffice.org-2.0-milestones
>
> Please anderstand also my point of view: I never can do "portupgrade
> -a", because of the "outdated" OOo-Port (I do not like to kompile
> OOo. It takes to much time, and several times it has failed).
>
> Heino

I don't like compiling OO either :)

Have you tried the -x option ? You can portupgrade everything but exclude=20
openoffice like so:

portupgrade -avx openoffice

Nicolas.

=2D-=20
=46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Sep 17 10:21:02 EDT 2006    =20
nicblais@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20
PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc

--nextPart2733244.NFQiRs39Q9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBFDvB14wTBlvcsbJURAoODAJ4lcqxg1zRiqLTnBo9Yb6vDb8wT1ACdFQpV
JnlnKmpZeHhZPGE5U4hGZ7c=
=81TG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2733244.NFQiRs39Q9--