Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 09:30:53 +0100 From: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, sef@kithrup.com, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix/NT synchronization model (was: SMP progress?) Message-ID: <199606060830.JAA24251@tees> In-Reply-To: <1856.834001792@critter2.tfs.com> References: <199606051858.LAA29430@phaeton.artisoft.com> <1856.834001792@critter2.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Poul-Henning" == Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> writes: Poul-Henning> In message <199606051858.LAA29430@phaeton.artisoft.com>, >> Each time I pull an updated tree from my local mirror of the CVS >> tree, I must re-merge and re-integrate all of my patches. Poul-Henning> join the club. :-( Well, a cludge way to do it is to not ctm the cvs tree but just the source tree and then maintain your own cvs tree with the FreeBSD sources on a vendor branch. If you want to have FreeBSD's cvs tree as well then stick it somewhere else. The ctm patches to src then get applied to a vendor branch of *your* cvs tree. I've never tried this but I've been thinking about it a bit.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606060830.JAA24251>