From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan  4 20:07:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA00211
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 20:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA00205
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 20:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA04065; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 20:06:38 -0800
To: adrian@virginia.edu
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Anyone got GNU `dld' ported to FreeBSD? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Jan 1996 23:02:25 EST."
             <Pine.SUN.3.90.960104223959.26188A-100000@stretch.cs.Virginia.edu> 
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 20:06:38 -0800
Message-ID: <4062.820814798@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	I am not sure why we need dld, unless there are applications 
> which are relying on some specific dld features.  Unless I am mistaken, 
> the stock ld should be capable of run-time linking.  This feature was 
> added to support the Franz Lisp implmentation.

Yeah, the `ld -A' stuff has been around for a long time.

My problem is that I don't want to rely on an external link step! :-(

						Jordan