Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:33:17 +0300 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: Ben Fiedler <bfiedler@asu.edu>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GSoC: BSD text tools Message-ID: <AANLkTikz2m7LS0DC4i7tKFSHQIyZuCKSxiHWlyTHClhs@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201005251450.o4PEo9tF099503@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <AANLkTik90k1HlsDJsIgRhCnAcU8_ympR15ZJcoL07A5m@mail.gmail.com> <201005251450.o4PEo9tF099503@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No. Do not remove groff or associated tools from /usr/src ! > Roff has been in Unix /usr/src since '77 or earlier. > A lot of people use tools from that descendancy as production tools. So? If it isn't a very commonly used tool and isn't necessary for 99% of cases I don't seem the harm of removing it from base and making it a port? > > However if you just mean > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0"I'll be working on getting man to call XYZ ra= ther than groff" > then I have no comment. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikz2m7LS0DC4i7tKFSHQIyZuCKSxiHWlyTHClhs>