From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Apr 15 23:53:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C3A37B43C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 23:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from trini0@optonline.net)
Received: from optonline.net (ool-18be012f.dyn.optonline.net [24.190.1.47])
 by mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000))
 with ESMTP id <0GBV002LVHTKA4@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for stable@freebsd.org;
 Mon, 16 Apr 2001 02:53:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 02:53:41 -0400
From: trini0 <trini0@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: default ipfilter rules
To: Daryl Chance <dchance@midsouth.rr.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@freebsd.org>
Message-id: <3ADA96F5.8030405@optonline.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386; en-US; 0.8.1)
 Gecko/20010411
References: <005701c0c61e$728aa020$0200000a@satan>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I use it, and I say leave it empty.  Let the administrator come up with 
a config for their particular situation.....


Daryl Chance wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In light of the recent ipfilter problems, i was looking around
> in /etc and noticed that theres no default ipf.rules or
> ipfilter.rules.  Is there a reason for this?  ipfw has rc.firewall
> or rc.filter, etc etc.  Should there be?  If nothing, except the
> fact that no one has checked in a default on, is keeping this from
> being in the release, should we check one in?  I don't use ipfilter
> but I do assume some people do.
> 
> TIA,
> Daryl.
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message