From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 16 19:59:35 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE5316A417
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:59:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org)
Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org
	[64.147.160.152])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28EE813C467
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:59:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org)
Received: (qmail 7546 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Oct 2007 19:59:57 -0000
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:59:57 -0700
From: "David E. Thiel" <lx@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20071016195957.GB74861@redundancy.redundancy.org>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <47150D87.3070804@gmx.de> <47150F82.9060805@FreeBSD.org>
	<20071016125400.N598@10.0.0.1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071016125400.N598@10.0.0.1>
X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13
X-OpenPGP-Key-available: http://redundancy.redundancy.org/lx.gpg
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Subject: Re: SCHED_4BSD in RELENG_7 disturbs workflow
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:59:35 -0000

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:55:35PM -0700, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> It would indeed be good to know if ULE improves things for you.  However, 
> there have been a number of other reports about non-scheduler related 
> regressions with x windows on 7.0.  I run 7.0 on a UP laptop without 
> difficulty.  I wonder if it has something to do with a particular device or 
> driver.

Yeah, I suspect these issues are not scheduler-related. LoN, could we
get a dmesg? I'm interested to compare with some other systems I've
seen these issues on.

Thanks,
David