From owner-cvs-ports Mon May 4 00:55:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA10607 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 00:55:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports) Received: (from sos@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA10518; Mon, 4 May 1998 00:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos) Message-Id: <199805040754.AAA10518@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources In-Reply-To: <199805040722.AAA02285@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "May 4, 98 00:22:17 am" To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 00:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, eivind@yes.no, mph@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-to: sos@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Satoshi Asami who wrote: > Hey guys, can we stop this madness now? ijb is going to stay in the > tree. That does not mean we are all going to agree with the > principles behind it or anything, it's because whether a ported > software is "desirable" or not is not for us to judge. > > Those who argue that this shouldn't be in there (or should be modified > to enforce whatever policy we think is "right"), or those who are > arguing how useful this is and how annoying the dancing ads are, are > both completely missing the point. We're just providing easy ways to > install tools, the users will decide. > > Let this discussion die, and can we now move back to our regularly > scheduled tcl/java flamewar? Sure, but statements as those Eivind came up with shouldn't stand alone. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Soren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team So much code to hack -- so little time.