From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 30 08:00:16 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13AD106566C
	for <freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C5F8FC12
	for <freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5U80GpP016692
	for <freebsd-net@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:00:16 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5U80GC5016691;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:00:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:00:16 GMT
Message-Id: <201006300800.o5U80GC5016691@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/144898: [wpi] [panic] wpi panics system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:00:17 -0000

The following reply was made to PR kern/144898; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, kamikaze@bsdforen.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/144898: [wpi] [panic] wpi panics system
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:59:36 +0200

 Just a followup. The device works when I reduce kern.hz to 200Hz.
 
 There's a 50% package loss, but TCP works fine as long as you can
 live with the increased latency. Of course you can forget about
 UDP.
 
 I can still reliably produce a panic by turning the hardware radio
 switch off while the device is up.
 
 Also the range of the device is really bad. I cannot establish a
 connection in the exact same spot where an atheros device works
 flawlessly and reports great reception.
 
 Regards
 
 -- 
 A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
 A: Top-posting.
 Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?