From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 17:48:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF53116A4CE; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944AA43D31; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.0.34] (adsl-67-127-84-57.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.127.84.57]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7DHmQ8U030719; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:48:26 -0700 Message-ID: <411CFEEA.2010602@root.org> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:48:26 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040702) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <20040813155203.3B45F5D04@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20040813155203.3B45F5D04@ptavv.es.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: acpi@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: acpi mpsafe committed X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:48:32 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: >>Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:35:48 -0700 >>From: Nate Lawson >>Sender: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org >> >>Let me know if there are any problems. >> >>Thanks for testing: Rong-En Fan , Kevin Oberman >>, marcel. >> >>(And now the same to you! :) > > > Why do I see things right AFTER the commit? (O.K. I actually saw them > late last night, but was too tired to do any testing and am still in the > process of building kernels to do some real testing.) > > Since I installed a kernel/modules with the mpsafe patches I have found > that P4_TCC and throttling no longer work. They worked with an unpatched > kernel/modules built on Wednesday and failed with the patched > kernel/modules I am now running. I have not updated the sources between > the two kernel builds, so I think it has to be the patches. Ok, I fixed it. Thanks for the detailed report. -Nate