Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:09:51 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Rusmir Dusko <nemysis@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r327791 - in head/graphics/eos-movrec: . files Message-ID: <20130923100951.GA23946@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130923093738.GA38974@nemysis4now> References: <20130923093738.GA38974@nemysis4now>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:37:38AM +0200, Rusmir Dusko wrote: > > When I first ported this nice little program, it was simple GUI application > > (hence USE_QT4=gui only). Now with what looks like minor version update, > > it pulls in the whole Qt framework with everything including qt3support and > > webkit. > > > > Can you elaborate what happened to an utility for capturing short movies > > from a camera that it started to require webkit, designer, phonon, etc.? > > Did the author go insane? Broken prebuild checks? Can this shit be made > > optional at least? > > I don't know what author make and how programm this GUI application. You're enlisted as maintainer of this software. You are supposed to know a lot about it. Otherwise, you should have left it maintained by ports@, like I originally did. > I have only looked in build log and elaborate what is used, > and this have added in Makefile for QT4 framework. > > ... several lines of -I/path/to/some/qt4/stuff skipped ... So, you just brought in Qt4 framework in its entirety just because you've noticed some familiar words in -I flag paths? And it did not trigger a slightest doubt? Sorry Rusmir, I'm speechless. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130923100951.GA23946>