Date: 02 Mar 2000 17:16:33 -0800 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Gawel <gawel@sim.com.pl>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make fetch + dependencies Message-ID: <vqchfeokg3y.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2000 12:45:15 -0500" References: <38BA81C7.E7FA0940@sim.com.pl> <vqcpute9wr6.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000302122145.A448@argon.blackdawn.com> <20000302124515.A2211@argon.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> * On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 12:21:45PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: * > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 02:00:13PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: * > > make DEPENDS_TARGET=checksum checksum * > * > Cool! I didn't know that it was even possible to recursively download all * > distfiles of a port. Perhaps a target that calls checksum with * > DEPENDS_TARGET=checksum is in order, to simplify things? * * I spoke too soon. The above does not download the dependencies' distfiles * recursively. Sorry, it should have been "make DEPENDS_TARGET=checksum extract". I forgot that the dependency is checked from extract, not checksum. * I can, if you do not know of a way to do this with the current bsd.port.mk, * attempt to create a new target that will perform this task. Actually there is a PR (12548) with a skeleton. I don't really like that implementation (I think the recursive fetching should be done only if the dependency (executable/file/shlib) check fails), but you may want to take a look. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqchfeokg3y.fsf>