From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 2 05:44:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBDAFC54; Fri, 2 May 2014 05:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC10F1B1F; Fri, 2 May 2014 05:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp.elischer.org (ppp121-45-232-70.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.232.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s425in17084282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 May 2014 22:44:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <536330CC.3060600@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:44:44 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis , David Chisnall Subject: Re: odd message from ld in -current around 9.0 branchpoint References: <535F3B87.4060706@freebsd.org> <1398773853.22079.2.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <535FC85E.9020002@freebsd.org> <535FE3D9.5040508@freebsd.org> <1A6F930D-8E5F-438C-B6A4-4FA16370B0D9@FreeBSD.org> <20140501142732.GB9578@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20140501142732.GB9578@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current , Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 05:44:55 -0000 On 5/1/14, 10:27 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:53:02AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:39, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> I just recompiled ld and gcc and it's still not working.. did we break sysroot support some time in 2011? >> My memory may be faulty, but I was under the impression that we switched *to* enabling sysroot support in the toolchain some time around 2012. --sysroot= appears to work with ld (at least) on 10.0, but it didn't on 9.0 and I don't know if the change was MFC'd to 9. >> > I finally got around to making the change last November so it's in 10, > but I've not merged it to 9 or 8 because I don't use them. Anyone > should feel free to do so if it's useful. > > -- Brooks I'm happy as it is.. should probably go into 9.. I'd skip 8. Our 8 based build systems seem to work but when I try use it directly if fails.. I tlooks like "someone" compiled ld from binutils some years ago and just checked the binary in somewhere. One of a series of 'poor judgement' actions that I've been fighting to clean up. anyhow it doesn't matter as it works in the upcoming platform and the old one we are migrating away from even if we are not sure why it works there.. :-)