From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 28 04:37:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA24764 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:37:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from paranoid.convey.ru (ws02.convey.ru [195.182.128.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA24751 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:37:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ark@localhost) by paranoid.convey.ru (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA03850; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:36:32 +0300 From: ArkanoiD Message-Id: <199702281236.PAA03850@paranoid.convey.ru> Subject: Re: Fatal traps 12 == shitty motherboard | memory ??? To: rashid@rk.wbs.com (Rashid Karimov) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:36:31 +0300 (MSK) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199702271929.OAA00290@rk.wbs.com> from "Rashid Karimov" at Feb 27, 97 02:29:04 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk nuqneH, > It's been quite a time since that posting , wasn't it ? > Anyway, it's mostly related to the bad memory when you have > infamous Trap 12: using anything but 60ns with 133Mhz > Pentiums or just plain bad memory ( in this case it will > usually fail himem.exe test). > :( no i'm sure memory is not the problem. the machine was heavy tested and i even tried to replace memory with another SIMMs.. and i tried changing motherboard too - to another HX a bit earlier version.. It increased stability somehow but did not solve the problem completely. (i mean it was motherboard change that helped,not replacing SIMMs). btw i forgot to mention - mine is p100,not p133 - it was said it is more reliable so i chose to use p100.. -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_| [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!