From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Feb 8 21:16:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E096AA167B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allanjude@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (mx1.scaleengine.net [209.51.186.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55237173B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allanjude@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [192.168.1.10]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6069ED25D for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: making editors/openoffice-devel within poudriere: out of swap with 10 GByte To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20160208203812.GA5911@c720-r292778-amd64> From: Allan Jude Message-ID: <56B903E2.3050407@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:08:50 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160208203812.GA5911@c720-r292778-amd64> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:16:12 -0000 On 2016-02-08 15:38, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a poudriere oven, amd64 based on r292778 and poudriere 3.1.99.20151204 > which served fine to build some 1700 ports. Yesterday I started to make > in addition editors/openoffice-devel, and it ended up eating all > attached swap space and at the end today with out of swap after some ~15 hours... > > The swap is 4 GByte /dev/ada0p3 and in addition 6 plain files of 1 GByte added > as swap devices. > > What I do not understand, while watching the situation with top, there > have only be running as maximum 2 processes clang++, and always starting new > processes for new foo.cxx files, and theses have had a memory of some > let's says 200 Mbytes each, as max. How can this lead to eat up 10 GByte swap > space? > > matthias > Where you using the tmpfs feature of poudriere? I believe it is on by default. This will obviously use up a bunch of ram and cause swapping. -- Allan Jude