From nobody Mon Sep 16 22:58:38 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X70wk21vBz5WMQM for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.org (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840::12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X70wh5g3Jz4TjK; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org designates 2a0b:f840::12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org; arc=pass ("uucp.dinoex.org:s=M20221114:i=1") Received: from uucp.dinoex.org (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840:0:0:0:0:0:12]) by uucp.dinoex.org (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 48GN96lp026474 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:09:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=uucp.dinoex.org; s=M20221114; t=1726528149; cv=none; b=AtmrViBmXCxlh1j4ecCxHut64OIGh0sIjj9B9OrAHKnl0ztlIL4fyqEO2OV6fhv3o0/VYPUsMklCEnyzMszJZkP+syS+cnqEmK9asjzHonfGtueHG2/PdpDc654KgRpjEJgXfZB9BKCYHrvC59p41nmMKbNnR0DswkQAJZCg0aA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=uucp.dinoex.org; s=M20221114; t=1726528149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=55KU1KNcwVz9Nl2TTUZQXmarwRPLSYfqNDo6t8u8F3A=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:X-Authentication-Warning:Date: From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:X-Milter:X-Greylist; b=jkjvHS1UsFJ6v2bLrYkrWcxKfztElPDen2VA9wFmEvCuFlVRIgdCvoM2RXoQ2CTDtCwtFFqM29FOm3J5u5pmg7N8nSYGbG/ieDzmqeZf8yLJqYZQWsWqC/kEMMS5ir89C/ylyJDGwMoxfEMqT45h8sIXnaB8DF9A6pw8kZ+wS/M= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; uucp.dinoex.org Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.org (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) with UUCP id 48GN96IY026473; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:09:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from disp.intra.daemon.contact (disp-e.intra.daemon.contact [IPv6:fd00:0:0:0:0:0:0:112]) by admn.intra.daemon.contact (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 48GN1Z9s008150 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:01:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from disp.intra.daemon.contact (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disp.intra.daemon.contact (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 48GMwcVF027450 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:58:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: (from pmc@localhost) by disp.intra.daemon.contact (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 48GMwcMS027449; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:58:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: disp.intra.daemon.contact: pmc set sender to pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org using -f Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:58:38 +0200 From: Peter To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: cmt@freebsd.org Subject: 13.4 compiles firefox functionally different Message-ID: List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.org; Sender-ip: 0:0:2a0b:f840::; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.org;) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840:0:0:0:0:0:12]); Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:09:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.58 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[uucp.dinoex.org:s=M20221114:i=1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.72)[0.718]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:205376, ipnet:2a0b:f840::/32, country:DE]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sub.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X70wh5g3Jz4TjK Hi, after upgrading to 13.4-RC2-p1, I recompiled all ports. Today I found my firefox can no longer render a certain webpage; the output is garbled as if the CSS were missing/defective. Here is details and picture: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/firefox-displays-unintellegible-garbage-only-on-freebsd.94963/post-671994 The firefox version is -esr-115.15.0,1, from 2024Q3 as of a week ago. Investigation showed: * firefox from package as of today (130.something) works well. * firefox-esr from package as of today (128.something) works well. * firefox-esr from ports as of today (128.2.0esr) freshly compiled on 13.4-RC2-p1 also works well (prereqs still from last week) * firefox-esr 115.14.0_1,1 locally compiled a few weeks ago on Rel. 13.3 also works well. So I did verify: I restarted a Rel.13.3-p5, fetched all prereqisite ports from backup (so these were also compiled on 13.3), and then compiled firefox-esr-115.15.0,1, the very same that now renders garbage, using the very same ports tree, with OS running 13.3-p5. And that one now works! So bottomline is: firefox-esr 115.15.0,1 - the one that was in 2024Q3 until about a week ago - works correct when compiled on 13.3 (along with all it's prereq ports), but renders garbage for a certain webpage when compiled on 13.4-RC2 (along with all it's prereq ports). I don't like this, because now the question is: what else might 13.4 compile so that it suddenly functions differently? (I glanced thru PR 277021 - but it doesn't seem to mention anything about webpages displaying broken, or any functional difference) Any idea how this might come to happen, anybody?