From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 9 7:17:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558A037B4E5 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26972E443 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:17:11 -0500 (EST) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eA9FHBc02234; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:17:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from khera) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14858.49143.548683.283677@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:17:11 -0500 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rsh problems In-Reply-To: <200011090204.TAA35157@harmony.village.org> References: <200011090136.MAA19414@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> <200011090204.TAA35157@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.80 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "WL" == Warner Losh writes: WL> : Nothing in /usr/src/UPDATING to suggest this??? WL> It was my understanding that rshd no longer used pam. [onceler]% ldd /usr/libexec/rshd /usr/libexec/rshd: libpam.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 (0x28067000) libutil.so.3 => /usr/lib/libutil.so.3 (0x28070000) libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28079000) [onceler]% uname -a FreeBSD onceler.kciLink.com 4.2-BETA FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Thu Nov 2 17:42:31 EST 2000 root@onceler.kciLink.com:/amd/yertle/u/yertle2/usr.obj/amd/onceler/u/onceler1/usr/src/sys/ONCELER i386 It seems to use pam from where I sit. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message