From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  4 20:11:41 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67B71065675
	for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2008 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@fer.hr)
Received: from xaqua.tel.fer.hr (xaqua.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835B48FC23
	for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2008 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@fer.hr)
Received: by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix, from userid 20006)
	id AAF419B651; Thu,  4 Sep 2008 21:54:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on xaqua.tel.fer.hr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [192.168.200.110] (zec2.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.79])
	by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832EC9B645
	for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2008 21:54:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marko Zec <zec@fer.hr>
To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:54:45 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <48C03A8B.4050607@elischer.org>
	<20080904195031.GB4117@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080904195031.GB4117@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809042154.45130.zec@fer.hr>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:22:09 +0000
Subject: Re: next vimage commit.. a comment
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
	<freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>,
	<mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>,
	<mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:11:41 -0000

On Thursday 04 September 2008 21:50:31 Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:44:11PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Some have suggested that we change the VNET_ITERLOOP_BEGIN() /
> > VNET_ITERLOOP_END()  code,
> > and thinking about this I suggest that we go straight for the
> > final solution of:
> >
> > change:
> > 	code
> > 	code
> > 	code
> >
> > to:
> >
> > 	FOREACH_VNET(VINET, vnet_inet) {
> > 		code
> > 		code
> > 		code
> > 	}
> >
> > straight away. and get it over and done with...
> >
> > anyone have thoughts?
>
> I agree.  We should avoid committing new code we plan to rip up
> later.

OK I'll do this

Marko