From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 08:03:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED966C6 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from graal.it-profi.org.ua (graal.shurik.kiev.ua [193.239.74.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8877D2A6E for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.76.201.82] (helo=thinkpad.it-profi.org.ua) by graal.it-profi.org.ua with esmtpa (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1X7g4j-000Jix-W9 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:25:58 +0300 Message-ID: <53C77A80.90007@shurik.kiev.ua> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:25:52 +0300 From: Alexandr Krivulya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB 2.0 webcam in virtualbox on CURRENT not working! References: <20140716132843.60e861a0@munin.walstatt.dyndns.org> <53C664AD.9030100@dat.pl> <53C6F160.7040000@selasky.org> <20140717083038.22b850cd@laptop.minsk.domain> In-Reply-To: <20140717083038.22b850cd@laptop.minsk.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.76.201.82 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on graal.it-profi.org.ua); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:03:41 -0000 17.07.2014 08:30, Sergey V. Dyatko пишет: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:40:48 +0200 > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> On 07/16/14 13:40, Maciej Milewski wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 16.07.2014 13:28, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> I desperately need to have a SKYPE based chat with an offshore >>>> department. Since Skype is not a native port, I try to use a virtual >>>> box running Windows 7. And here the nightmare begins. >>>> >>>> Skype works in the VBox, but audio only. I have two WebCAMs here, a >>>> brand new Logitech C270 and a older Medion MD86511. The latter one can >>>> be seen in the device list of Windows 7 within the VBox, but can not be >>>> activated. >>>> >>>> More frustrating, the Logitech C270, doesn't work, it is not even seen >>>> by the VBox. I tested the cam on another Windows 7 system of a >>>> colleague and it works. FreeBSD does also "see" this USB Cam, but why >>>> is the device hidden for the VBox? >>> What do you mean by saying "see"? >>> usbconfig on freebsd lists it as ugen device? >>> Is it attached to vbox machine by some filter? >>> Have you tried VBoxManage usbfilter add? >>> I'm currently using some kind of software security jingle device this way: >>> VBoxManage usbfilter add 1 --target VMachineName --name USBKey >>> --vendorid 0x???? --productid 0x???? >>> But I haven't used any webcam this way. >>> >>>> In the configuration, I have the ability to enable/disable USB 2.0 >>>> subsystem. Enabled, VBox rejects to start on all FBSD around (9.3-PRE, >>>> 11-CURRENT). What is that? Is VBox not capable of using USB 2.0 >>>> devices in conjunction with FreeBSD? >>>> >>>> How to solve this? Is there a Skype 6 client for FreeBSD? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, please CC me, >>>> Oliver >> Hi, >> >> Skype: >> >> Mount this union with /usr/ports: >> >> https://github.com/cpu82/skype4-ports >> >> And then you can install skype and even use the video chat. > Note: This GH repository is outdated, please, you should install or update your > ports tree from the following repository: > > https://github.com/xmj/linux-ports/ > > follow the instructions on https://github.com/xmj/linux-ports/ > Does it planned to be merged into main ports tree?