From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 21 16:49:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E7616A404 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40F513C487 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3LGnwLQ078323; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:49:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3LGnvWw055349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:49:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200704211649.l3LGnvWw055349@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:50:28 -0400 To: Marcel Moolenaar , Stefan Lambrev From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: <4628D63A.3050909@sun-fish.com> <20070420152329.GA16702@icarus.home.lan> <049954BE-364B-4897-87C3-342D0A824C00@mac.com> <4629C650.2030607@sun-fish.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio0: port may not be enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:49:59 -0000 At 12:42 PM 4/21/2007, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >>ports are swapped but this is probably because I swap them in bios, >>but this is ok. >>Serial is working and now I can start working on the main problem :) >>So it's not acpi problem, but instead problem with sio? > >So it appears. I have been using uart by default on a number of boards in RELENG_6 for a while now, I have had far better luck with it than sio. Especially for dialup applications, sio always seems to have overflow issues as opposed to uart ---Mike