From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Mar 24 07:27:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA13326
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 07:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA13218;
          Mon, 24 Mar 1997 07:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0w9BbH-00057u-00; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 08:23:55 -0700
To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru>
Subject: Re: issetuid() 
Cc: peter@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-current <current@freebsd.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 24 Mar 1997 17:07:48 +0300."
		<Pine.BSF.3.95q.970324170010.832A-100000@nagual.ru> 
References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970324170010.832A-100000@nagual.ru>  
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 08:23:55 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0w9BbH-00057u-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970324170010.832A-100000@nagual.ru> =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= writes:
: Peter, as I remember you have plans to implement issetuid(). Right now too
: many changes sneaked in the source tree which require it. As I think,
: implementation can be done easily, just check P_SUGID bit. Also setuid() 
: etc syscalls must be cleaned slightly to not set this bit when not really
: neccessary (i.e. when the same uid/gid is set). Do you have something for
: review at this moment? 

There were already a bunch of other places that used the same code I
did, or a variation on them.  I at least tagged my with XXX should use
issetugid(), others didn't.

Warner