From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jan 11 16:25:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA18315
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA18308
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <16157(6)>; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:25:05 PST
Received: by crevenia.parc.xerox.com id <177476>; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:24:52 -0800
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To: jfieber@indiana.edu, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject: Re: Mounting devfs on /dev
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <97Jan11.162452pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:24:43 PST
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>bpf: ppp0 attached
>bpf: ppp1 attached
>bpf: lo0 attached
>
>...bpf1 and bpf2 seems to be missing, too.

The "bpf: ... attached" messages just mean that that interface has
registered itself with bpf, not that bpf has that number of minor
devices.  bpf just has the number of minors that are configured in your
kernel configuration.  (So if you have "pseudo-device bpfilter 3" then
bpf1 and bpf2 are missing...)

  Bill