From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 22 16:37:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id QAA09675 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 16:37:33 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA09669 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 16:37:32 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id BAA09036 ; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 01:37:30 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id BAA26163 ; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 01:37:29 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507222337.BAA26163@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: MX records and sendmail To: nc@ai.net (Network Coordinator) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 01:37:29 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Network Coordinator" at Jul 22, 95 07:34:12 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#880 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 690 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > # if we are the best MX host for a site, try it directly instead of config err > > #O TryNullMXList > > I was just looking at the sendmail.cf that I believe came with my > installation of FreeBSD since I assumed that is what Nate would be using. > You are right that not all sendmails will react that way. Moreover, the example I gave is for 8.7 :-) The correct example for a 8.6 sendmail such as the one we have in -current (8.6.11) is the following : # if we are the best MX host for a site, try it directly instead of config err OwFalse -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT #5: Fri Jul 14 12:28:04 MET DST 1995