From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Nov 18 17:35:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp [202.232.14.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664FE15018 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:35:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp) Received: by tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp; id KAA01693; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:35:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from unknown(192.168.144.2) by tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp via smap (V4.2) id xma001686; Fri, 19 Nov 99 10:34:55 +0900 Received: from hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (8.9.3/3.7W99092011) with ESMTP id KAA06259 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:35:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:35:07 +0900 Message-ID: <14388.43339.834504.26482Z@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> From: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCL's plus patches In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 20:03:40 -0500 (EST)" <199911190103.UAA54629@misha.cisco.com> References: <199911190103.UAA54629@misha.cisco.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.0.3 (Notorious) SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.5 (Hirahata) Emacs/20.4 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.3 - "Komaiko") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, all. > Are those being considered to be included into the TCL port(s)? > Yours, I think tcl ports *must* include plus patch! - Plus patch has upper compatibility to original one. so other tcl depended ports will get no damages. - Plus patch incudes many bug fixes. so we got more stable tcl environments. - Plus patch contains many enhancements, such as more usefull i18n features, so it is good for many asian peoples as well as C locale peoples. I've already made a patch file. Shall I post it? Or should I make "tcl plus" ports? - Taguchi, Takeshi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message