From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Mar  2 11:14:42 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6725137B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Mar 2003 11:14:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F3043FA3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Mar 2003 11:14:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from pool0246.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.246] helo=mindspring.com)
	by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 18pYuv-0006IO-00; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:14:35 -0800
Message-ID: <3E6257B1.32AB9644@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:12:49 -0800
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>,
	current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ?
References: <9064.1046627721@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a40e82b3f33a558e7c588d970fa3516a6393caf27dac41a8fd350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20030303034332.Y30986-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> > My main concern would be if the chips have the necessary "umphf"
> >> > to actually do a real-world job once they're done running all the
> >> > overhead of 5.0-R.  The lack of cmpxchg8 makes the locking horribly
> >> > expensive.
> >>
> >> Actually, the lack of cmpxchg8 only makes locking more expensive.  It's
> >
> >I.e., strictly more expensive, but not much more.
> 
> Bruce, it is not a matter of the relative expensiveness of the various
> implementations of locking primitives, its a matter of the cummulative
> weight of all the locks we add to the system.

Bruce's "make world" benchmark gave coverage of the cumulative
weight, in support of his point.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message