From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 21:01:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38413339505 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rzGF0n6Wz47fq for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 18FAA33947A; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C33339504 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rzGD6w9Lz47qn; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com (mail-qt1-f173.google.com [209.85.160.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3F7719782; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id e12so5658632qtr.9; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530n/A4wnkRVC/li4zv5HqXXOXDlRMo9bROl7pceHcBzYfSHAaR9 0zuy3XEhNAB4w499ko2FgJRO9RGjBwkms/GWX5s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwa00nWKDFxowwBepO2ZEsfp9czv1w1LBXv+PF98VerP+4gtOp1I8Gu+uxEpA1QiZLUgcNMsRD6hEmBH3UndhM= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4b47:: with SMTP id e7mr9357482qts.242.1592946068484; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <27f5739b-6bce-4b1c-8ca2-5b79e783b67d@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <27f5739b-6bce-4b1c-8ca2-5b79e783b67d@www.fastmail.com> From: Kyle Evans Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:00:56 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ports failing with -fno-common with clang 9/gcc 9 To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:01:09 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:35 AM Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, at 14:56, Kyle Evans wrote: > > In any event, I would urge folks to be proactive and identify this > > stuff, reporting issues upstream and spreading awareness of the > > impending default change for those projects that may not already be > > actively aware. > > > > On a closing note, I'm just going to kinda drop these patches here for > > anyone that's willing/able to help make this a collective effort to > > identify/fix/report problems here; they backport the default > > -fno-common patch from future-LLVM11 to the base system compiler on a > > system near you: > > > > HEAD: https://people.freebsd.org/~kevans/llvm-fnocommon-head.diff > > Can you ask for an exp-run with this patch applied? There needs > to be a comprehensive list of failing ports for people to be able > to work on this. We see some failing ports because of default > -fno-common in GCC 10 [1] already. > > [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246700 I can, but my only problem in doing so is that I cannot take responsibility for following up on the issues discovered. I have some outstanding exp-run that I've dropped the ball on, I'm a bit wobbly on personally requesting one for this unless some group of people can/will offer to make sure the issues are fixed so that the exp-run can actually be completed in a reasonable timeframe. Thanks, Kyle Evans