Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:18:14 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! Message-ID: <AANLkTimz_YpW3AYgK5bWSU117Wsi%2BZph8VwH16_rcrvt@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1PgiCZ-0000hL-Dy@clue.co.za> References: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com> <E1PgiCZ-0000hL-Dy@clue.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 January 2011 02:28, Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> wrote: >> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd >> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets >> would test this out and get back to me. > > Oddly enough, I think my AR9285 uses less power now. =A0This I do > know however: at boot, it associates much much faster. =A0I used to > have to wait at least 10 seconds for "the default route interface". > Now, association and DHCP blazes through without pausing. Can you please verify this? Would you please let me know which version of the OS you were running before this? I haven't changed anything on the AR9285 codebase that would account for the above. Something to keep in mind with the AR9280/AR9285 support is that I've seen it be -very- unpredictable - sometimes it's reliable off the bat, sometimes it's not. You have to repeat it a few times to verify that you've actually seen a change. Thanks, Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimz_YpW3AYgK5bWSU117Wsi%2BZph8VwH16_rcrvt>