From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 15:38:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2930516A401 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: from dev.null.cz (dev.null.cz [89.185.226.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FB413C4B8 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: from dev.null.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dev.null.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4GFNUEN069019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: (from buki@localhost) by dev.null.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l4GFNJxA069018; Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from buki) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:19 +0200 From: Buki To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Message-ID: <20070516152319.GG378@dev.null.cz> References: <200705101342.l4ADgCgg007728@lurza.secnetix.de> <20070510221221.GA44910@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <464392EC.5090203@elischer.org> <20070510223739.GA66016@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <4643C90D.9040906@elischer.org> <20070511015204.GA66910@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <1178935327.1786.6.camel@localhost> <200705151030.l4FAUbEE063594@fire.jhs.private> <86d5125fxo.fsf@dwp.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0jdOO2+ODOkP2/E4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86d5125fxo.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/3260/Wed May 16 15:17:18 2007 on dev.null.cz X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:53:31 +0000 Cc: Tom McLaughlin , jhs@berklix.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:38:45 -0000 --0jdOO2+ODOkP2/E4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 04:17:55PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > "Julian H. Stacey" writes: > > Someone asked whether lukemftpd offered functionality other(s) don't ? > > What about proxy ? > > > > I've never been sure which ftpd to run on my gateway (with IPFW, with n= o NAT) > > to provide proxy, so internal hosts could cd /usr/ports; make fetch >=20 > You don't need a proxy. Do the following on each internal host: >=20 > # echo 'FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=3DYES' >>/etc/profile actually, if the internal hosts use RFC1918 addresses this wouldn't suffice. He really needs either ftp proxy (and redirect all ftp traffic to it) or NAT. > DES > --=20 > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav - des@des.no Buki --=20 PGP public key: http://dev.null.cz/buki.asc /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML & Outlook Mail / \ http://www.thebackrow.net --0jdOO2+ODOkP2/E4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGSyHnPzhIkpLLm08RAs4TAJ4luy/xEYQ+ItQ/E6yhQJl9PamDaACgiHi6 gUack3rt9OYSpNDvfwtVdhw= =AD3N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0jdOO2+ODOkP2/E4--