From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 10 9:21:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jasper.heartland.ab.ca (jasper.heartland.ab.ca [207.107.228.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4991586E for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:21:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkwiebe@heartland.ab.ca) Received: from heartland.ab.ca (dyn115.heartland.ab.ca [207.107.228.115]) by jasper.heartland.ab.ca (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA12374; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:09:20 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <38512AAA.4B7CDBB0@heartland.ab.ca> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:30:34 -0700 From: Darren Wiebe Reply-To: dkwiebe@hagenhomes.com Organization: Hagen Homes Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Albsmeier Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How about using DIST_SUBDIR for ports w multiple files (StarOffice5) References: <19991210175316.A17711@internal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > Just mailed the following suggestion to the StarOffice5 > maintainer/committer and it was suggested to got to > the ports mailing list with it: I am listed as the maintainer and I never got your email... but anyways.. > > ------------------------ snip ----------------------- > > I got one suggestion: How about putting all the Staroffice > related files in a separate directory and not in ${DISTDIR} > directly? I think this is a good idea for all ports that > need multiple dist- or patchfiles... > I see the advantage in this. However, I think that if we are going to do it this way, then all ports that fetch more than one file would have to have their own directory. Is this a good thing? I like being able to just quickly go through the distfiles dirctory and pick out files that I have more than one version of and delete them. Darren Wiebe dkwiebe@hagenhomes.com > ------------------------ snap ----------------------- > > What do people think about it? I find that the whole > DISTDIR is more maintable and easier to look at but > there can be things I didn't think of, of course... > > Thanks, > > -Andre > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message