From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 20 15:54:15 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA16492
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:54:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.visigenic.com (odin.visigenic.com [204.179.98.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA16485
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VSI48 (vsi48.visigenic.com [206.64.15.185])
          by odin.visigenic.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP
          id AAA2909; Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:51:22 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970220155351.0096d100@visigenic.com>
X-Sender: toneil@visigenic.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:53:51 -0800
To: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
From: "Tim Oneil" <toneil@visigenic.com>
Subject: Re: Windows95: what you don't know, you must reinvent
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 04:55 PM 2/20/97 -0500, you wrote:
> I'd like to see that - as I have a developer who's trying to 
> convince us to change the VTABLE format in our C++ compiler.
> He claims we should use Microsoft's; or else we won't be able
> to compile/run-with COM...  

I think he's right, but thats not enough. I'm not
aware of all the implications but theres got to be
more to it than changing the virtual symbol table
to fit ms.

-Tim