From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 00:31:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F2F106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D098FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1733319wwf.31 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YXqiwU4Ngp2iLi6Rnww4D9stDEzlnEoDvb3ZIqMNyQI=; b=JTuhaV0+Lo4mCoKEoa5a1p2fkUwxK9/3Rn41eP5D0zsDwDjs+JIGPLbDHrBtQjcuFi vwuYXsStI7bbuLybRkMpOROASQ97ly+ZUjejswjYaAy80GTJ0LAaOF59A2h7SixMj5X9 +jL/fXKAg1uQ+fuaYf5dCpQEvs24F65r1aABA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uo3xFOtnJQVVntTiasB6DU7q1DzAP4mvctU56wXrA6Xkr75A7sdaOT0sLd3fYCxlOZ mSh/cgYdzxoWMdVJ+c+QOeo6b+xntgZtM/cM1SI2GPUzcWkiaXOBjVxqf2+tRLl2khgo ieFrDWyMVo1NFYwpjVnXrpyfWeLax/1sJX8qI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.169.148 with SMTP id n20mr1333348wel.30.1291854701637; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:31:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: yanegomi@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.198.27 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:31:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D000448.1050606@telenix.org> <20101208230139.2097c2e8@core.draftnet> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:31:41 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AAH2gyIlV6aD52cH1aVBOcC_rHE Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Matthew Fleming Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Bruce Cran , FreeBSD-Hackers , Chuck Robey Subject: Re: getting a list of open files versus PID nos.? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:31:43 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:54:57 -0800 >>> Matthew Fleming wrote: >>> >>>> This is what lsof is for. =A0I believe there's one in ports, but I hav= e >>>> never tried it. >>> >>> Is there any advantage to using lsof instead of fstat(1) (fstat -p pid)= ? >> >> I believe that lsof reports on all open files by all processes, >> whereas fstat will only report on a specific provided pid. > > =A0 =A0lsof prints out all open file descriptors whereas I thought that > fstat had to be targeted to specific files / directories / vmcore > files / etc. Nevermind. As Andriy pointed out in a later post, I was wrong. Thanks, -Garrett