From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Jul 22 18:36:38 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA10621
          for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (pm26-7.image.dk [194.234.59.71])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA10613
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from root@internet.dk)
Received: from localhost (localhost.swimsuit.internet.dk [127.0.0.1])
	by darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id DAA18915
	for <isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 03:36:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 03:36:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Leif Neland <root@internet.dk>
X-Sender: root@darla.swimsuit.internet.dk
To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: MX CNAME
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02.9807230335370.13870-100000@darla.swimsuit.internet.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Why does named complain when a MX-record points to a CNAME?

Sendmail doesn't seem to have a problem with it.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message