From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 18 21:03:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA04496 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 21:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www2.shoppersnet.com (shoppersnet.com [204.156.152.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA04491 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 21:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from hlew@localhost) by www2.shoppersnet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA03443; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 21:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 21:04:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Howard Lew To: spork cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More Intel 10/100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, spork wrote: > I'd seen some traffic in the archives about the "unsupported PHY, type = > 7" messages with the Intel card, and I see that after I booted a > 2.2-stable kernel these went away: > > Jul 17 06:08:19 test /kernel.GENERIC: fxp0: Ethernet address > 00:a0:c9:5c:e5:84 > Jul 17 06:08:21 test /kernel.GENERIC: fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type > = 7, addr = 1 > Jul 17 06:35:21 test /kernel: fxp0 Ethernet> rev 2 int a irq 10 on pci0:11 > Jul 17 06:35:21 test /kernel: fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:5c:e5:84 > > So are all the various Intel "fxp" cards supported, regardless of which > chip is used? I'm just curious, as it seems like at some point the Intel > won out over the Digital as the "preffered" 10/100 card for FBSD. We're > dying to standardize on one card througout our shop... > > TIA, > > Charles > Hmmm... I'm using a 3.0-970606-snap with a rev 1 model in 10Base-T mode and have never seen such a message or had such a problem. It maybe specific to rev 2 models. Probe says: fxp0: rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on pci0.9.0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:39:19:42 found-> vendor=0xedd8, dev=0xa0a1, revid=0x00 class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 map[0]: type 3, range 32, base e0000000, size 23