From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Dec 15 14:19:41 2000 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 14:19:39 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-177-28.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.177.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1E337B400 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBFMTfo05053; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:29:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200012152229.eBFMTfo05053@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Geoff Buckingham Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: de-tuning scsi subsystem? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:50:17 GMT." <20001215165017.B79626@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:29:41 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Can anyone suggest a way to de-tune the scsi subsystem such that it does not > load, and therfore break the aac driver? (This would allow us to install a > machine with that RAID, and keep it running until the driver becomes stable > under load) aac doesn't use the scsi subsystem. I believe that Scott has tried rate-limiting I/O as well, without success. 8( -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message